Two FEMA agents went bear hunting, but just before reaching camp they saw a sign "Bear Left”, so they turned around and went home

FEMA abandons devastated NC town residents because they aren’t allowed to drive around ‘road closed’ sign: ‘Nobody’s been bringing in supplies except civilians’

BAT CAVE, North Carolina — Residents of a tiny North Carolina town that was almost totally destroyed by Hurricane Helene fending for themselves after FEMA told them that a “road closed” sign is an insurmountable obstacle for the agency to navigate.

“FEMA called me and told me they wanted to inspect my house then called me back to say they couldn’t drive around the ‘road closed’ sign. They weren’t allowed,” local Chelsea Atkins, 38, told The Post.

“You can drive it by car for sure, it’s not that bad, you just have to drive around the ‘road closed sign’. I explained that to them. They said they couldn’t,” she said, recounting her maddening exchange with the embattled federal agency.

Left to fend for themselves, Bat Cave residents banded together — opening the roads and starting the arduous work of cleanup and recovery. Residents told The Post that they don’t need FEMA now — and at this point, they don’t even want the disaster relief agency to come.

Here’s hoping the Bat Cave residents can show the same gumption to go around the sign in the other direction and make it to the polls in time.

Look what unrolled from the TP roll (UPDATED)

Just another day at Columbia: David Rafferty says like it or lump it — and if you don't like it, transfer

Greenwich’s own, Mr. David Rafferty, has sized up the current campus thugs and written to the CT Insider to complain that Jews scared for their safety, and students whose classes, library study halls, and even their examinations are being disrupted and cancelled are free to shut up and stay, or find a new school and leave.

David Rafferty (opinion): Colleges are businesses. Students upset about protests can take their business elsewhere

“College is a business. … Ever since Saint Reagan kicked off the right-wing campaign to make America dumb (and also mean, bitter, and xenophobic) again, colleges and universities have been increasingly vilified by certain people as pinko ideological indoctrination centers. Liberal training camps that only serve to make people woke, question their gender and/or identity, and produce squishy navel-gazing young adults who are ill-prepared and ill-suited to survive in “real” America.” [No argument here — that’s exactly who and what they are; excellent description.]

“And sure, while it makes great headlines to cherry-pick stories about select students and select campus policies and movements that confirm some of those tropes, you know what else American colleges produce? A highly educated, highly engaged and highly motivated populace that continues to actually renew and replenish the cutting-edge workforce that remains the envy of the world.” [But those highly educated, motivated students are not the squishy, navel-gazing children mentioned above. Nor are they Molotov Cocktail-tossing Princeton graduates incinerating police cars.]

“Which is exactly what scares the deplorables when they see a boy on campus wearing mascara and a Me-Too T-shirt. They can’t, or won’t, see past his looks to see the critical thinker studying economics to better understand how climate change disrupts the supply chain. [Darn it, he’s right again: I don’t see that — can’t see what isn’t there]. What the deplorables actually can’t stand is that mascara boy will be smarter and more successful than they will be. Because done properly, higher education makes you better [I believe that Mr. Rafferty is himself a college graduate — and also a stay-at-home Mom. Just sayin’] so of course they have to hate the universities.”

“Enough soapboxing, and back to the premise that colleges are primarily a business. If you hired a painter or plumber and they didn’t do the job you wanted, you would fire them. If your bank laundered terrorist money you might take your money out and switch banks. If your landlord stopped repairing your home you’d move. That’s just business.” [So, our universities are the equivalent of incompetent tradesmen or corrupt bankers? I can buy that.] 

“Well, in the last year many colleges have been ground zero for pro-Palestinian protests, some of which were ugly and antisemitic, often leading to resignations, cancelled graduations, hostile police activities, harassment of students and teachers and so much more. These protests, regardless of what your position is regarding the never-ending Middle Eastern conflicts, sent tens of thousands of students home for the summer questioning everything, and wondering “what does it all mean?” for good ole State U.” [Sent home early, in fact, because the schools were forced to shut down.]

“It turns out that it meant very little. Yes, the protests are back and so are the responses from universities and law enforcement. But you know who else is back? All the students who said how much these protests, the hatred, and the over-the-top responses bothered them. Last year, thousands of alumni and university donors made headlines with very public denouncements of what was happening on campus, pulling their support and donations. You might have thought then that there would have been an uptick in students who did the same, deciding that they would rather take their education somewhere else.” [Certainly, the money did, as well as job opportunities for students: “Columbia University facing ‘donor crisis’ after anti-Israel protests on campus. Alumni money, and job opportunities for new graduates.”]

“Students [he means Jewish students] have been telling us for a year that they are struggling, that they don’t know what to do. They say their college is failing them, not supporting them, creating an unsafe space for them to learn and live. If they worked at Starbucks [as many of Rafferty’s favorite students will] and their boss regularly make them feel unsafe they’d quit. Yet they still overwhelmingly returned to the same schools, prepared to accept the same fearful, violent, antisemitic situations they left last May, and what should we make of that? Remember, college is a business. And this summer, students could have shown their schools they were serious about wanting better, telling them they’re taking their business elsewhere.” [And why should they?]

“Students choosing to transfer from Columbia or UCLA sends a message potentially even more powerful than alumni pulling their donations. It says you’re serious when you say you want a school that matches your moral and ethical code. It says too that obligation is a two-way street, [two-ways, or one-way? University administrators let the protestors rampage unpunished, while threatened students can leave. That might better be described as “our way or the highway”], and if the school isn’t prepared to support those morals, defend your safety and support you as a person [they aren’t — UVA caves, will not discipline disruptive anti-Israel activists: The students had all charges dropped after they met with Student Affairs officials.] then your leaving is on them. They will have cancelled themselves.”

“But if you stay, then that’s on you. Anyone currently on a campus where the protests and counter-protests, violence and fear is still front and center, well, you can’t say you didn’t have options.” [You have no right to expect your school to protect you or keep classes open — who do you think you are, anyway?]

Here’s an interesting fact Rafferty ignores or doesn’t care about:

More Than 10,000 Anti-Semitic Incidents Recorded in the U.S. Since Oct. 7, the Highest Yearly Total on Record, ADL Finds

At least 1,200 of those incidents occurred on college campuses, a 500 percent increase from the year prior

That rather dramatically shrinks the number of schools fearful students can flee to, no?

“It's clear however, that Greenwich is not immune from the tyranny of the stupid and small-minded that often lurks on the internet.” David raferty, November 17, 2017

UPDATE:

Reader Jennifer Lowitt has copied me with a letter she sent to the editors of CT Insider. It’s tone is far more polite than something I’d write, but I do like her penultimate point: “[S]tudents who choose not to be driven out by hate but instead continue their education and fight for their rights with their chins held high should be applauded, not vilified". I agree, though Rafferty won't — his admiration is reserved for the dolts, navel-gazers, and thugs who’ve infested the country’s campuses (query: why don’t they leave, if, as Rafferty claims students should “if you’re serious when you say you want a school that matches your moral and ethical code”? Are they choosing to stay because of principle? Then Rafferty should applaud Jewish students who are doing the same thing.)

To the Editor: 

I write to respond to David Rafferty’s opinion piece regarding “Colleges are Businesses…Students Upset about Protests can take their Business Elsewhere” and I was concerned by the tone and the statements on the subject. 

There actually has been a trend of Jewish students seeking transfers away from universities where antisemitism has exploded (see links below). I can also say that as a Jewish parent with college-age kids, I know more than a few Jewish students who are no longer applying to certain schools in the northeast and are instead applying in the south due to antisemitism concerns (as referenced in the free press article linked below) which will likely be further evident in the next application cycle. So, in fact, Jewish students are voting with their feet.  

In addition, transferring is not as easy as Mr. Rafferty makes it sound. Many students may be constrained by financial reasons (scholarships etc.) or geographical reasons. Yet he gives them no sympathy.  Finally, I would note that students who choose not to be driven out by hate but instead continue their education and fight for their rights with their chins held high should be applauded, not vilified. 

I’d be curious to see the resources Mr. Rafferty relied upon in forming his opinion if he would share them.  

Sincerely,  Jennifer Lowitt Riverside, Ct

Aha! So THAT's what she meant by "turn the page"

“She was a major player in everything we’ve done, including the passage of legislation which we were told we could never pass. She’s been, and her staff is interlocked with mine in terms of all the things we’re doing.” Jos. Biden, October 4, 2024

More of this, please

And as college campuses across the country prepare to celebrate the one-year anniversary of the Hamas Massacre tomorrow, the kick-off for a so-called “Week of Rage”, the demonstrators’ dimwitted supporters might want to see this, first:

Liars, liars, skirts on fire

Two small examples of why the demagogues and their flacks hate an unfettered Internet: their lies are now being exposed and fact-checked in minutes, instead of being buried by their captive press.

AND:

Kamkam's busy campaigning, Joe's on the beach; maybe we can ask George Bush to help?

John Hinderaker, PowerLine:

That Was Then, This Is Now

In Memories of Hurricane Katrina, I contrasted press coverage and Democratic Party hysteria over Hurricane Katrina, which effectively destroyed George W. Bush’s second term and contributed to the Democrats’ 2006 election victories, with the muted (if not altogether silent) reaction to Hurricane Helene and the vastly more problematic governmental response thereto.

It is a theme worth returning to. On CNN, Scott Jennings makes the point effectively:

Hinderaker:

Joe Biden is one step away from the obituary column, and no one has ever in her life relied on Kamala Harris to get anything done. The world takes it as a given that anything that is done in response to Helene will have nothing to do with our president or vice president. Or FEMA.

The press has tried to deflect attention from the Biden/Harris administration by blaming global warming for Hurricane Helene and the flooding in North Carolina, despite the fact that neither hurricanes, nor severe hurricanes, nor floods have increased in recent years. In fact, one of my relatives who lives in Asheville, North Carolina, tells me that virtually the exact same flood, maybe worse, occurred in 1916.

Hillary on why Internet forums must be censored: "We'll lose total control"

fire!

Hillary Clinton Says the Quiet Part Out Loud

“ … Hillary Clinton let the cat out of the bag during an interview with CNN on Saturday, where she spoke about the need to control social media. She said it should be ‘at the top" of every legislative agenda’. “

We should be, in my view, repealing something called section 230, which gave platforms on the internet immunity because they were thought to be just pass-throughs, that they shouldn’t be judged for the content that is posted. But we now know that that was an overly simple view. Whether it’s Facebook or Twitter or X or Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are, if they don’t moderate and monitor the content we lose total control and it’s not just the social and psychological effects, it’s real harm.

Hillary has company in her quest to shut down dissent, naturally.

Nick Arama: “The First Amendment was specifically created to protect incendiary speech, speech people may not have liked or might find wrong. That’s the very purpose of the Amendment.

“Here's George Washington law professor Jonathan Turley talking about how these are dangerous times for free speech with these thoughts. “

Governor Walz has been out there saying that misinformation and hate speech are not protected under the Constitution. And there's a crushing irony there. I mean, in calling for the censorship of other citizens accused of disinformation, the governor is spreading disinformation. He's been told repeatedly by many of us that he's wrong, that that's just completely and demonstrably wrong. The Constitution does protect those forms of speech.

…. "You have two former Democratic presidential nominees who have been going to this sort of global elite, asking for Europe and others to censor fellow Americans. Hillary Clinton did that after @elonmusk took over Twitter, went to Europe and said, please use the Digital Services Act. This really horrific new law to censor fellow Americans because Musk isn't going to do it, force him to do it." "These are the same voices. Who's saying the same things since the beginning of our republic, that they have a reason to silence others."

Hillary, instigator of the most significant misinformation campaign in recent memory with her Russian conspiracy claim, and her two Democrat friends shown above are not alone in their thirst to place citizens’ speech back under the control of the state; it’s the goal of all Democrat politicians and their corporate allies (as a very tiny example, Google Ad Sense has permanently closed my account for violating its “Publisher Guidelines”, which prohibit, among other topics:

Dangerous or derogatory content

We do not allow content that:

  • incites hatred against, promotes discrimination of, or disparages an individual or group on the basis of their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalization.

Unreliable and harmful claims

We do not allow content that:

  • makes claims that are demonstrably false and could significantly undermine participation or trust in an electoral or democratic process.

    Examples: information about public voting procedures, political candidate eligibility based on age or birthplace, election results, or census participation that contradicts official government records

  • promotes harmful health claims, or relates to a current, major health crisis and contradicts authoritative scientific consensus.

    Examples: Anti-vaccine advocacy, denial of the existence of medical conditions such as AIDS or Covid-19, gay conversion therapy

  • contradicts authoritative scientific consensus on climate change.

Mine is a very small matter; sites with real influence, however are also being demonetized, and that threatens to put them out of business. PJ Media, parent host of Town Hall, Red State, Hot Air, Daily Caller, and Twitchy, and has been hammered by Google, as detailed in the article below, and the list of articles shown includes only articles that appeared on PJ Media itself; dozens more on the other sites have also been flagged and demonetized.

Google Is Completely Out of Control

PJ Media, like all independent conservative/populist media outlets, is constantly demonetized by Google.

(Emphasis on “independent; we’re not competing on an even playing field with certain unnamed “conservative” outlets that are boosted in the algorithms via sweetheart Silicon Valley deals and then pretend they are besieged by “cancel culture,” nor are we talking about legacy media behemoths like Fox News that are not throttled in the same manner.)

A little definitional housekeeping: by “demonetized,” we mean that any article smeared by the fickle Google gods with this black mark of shame is no longer eligible to host Google ads, which means it cannot generate any ad revenue for the company.

Many readers might be generally aware of the demonetization warfare tactic designed to suppress dissident media but may not be aware of just how many PJ Media articles are demonetized on a regular basis, which has the intended effect of crippling revenue and, ultimately, putting us out of business forever.

So, just how many PJ Media articles has Google demonetized?

One? Two? A dozen?

Oh, you sweet summer child!

The answer is 109.

Google currently has attached “demonetized” flags to 109 PJ Media articles.

Here we have the complete list of demonetized PJ Media articles:

Demonetized PJ Media Articles - PJMedia (1) by PJ Media on Scribd

https://reason.com › 2022 › 10 › 27 › yes-you-can-yell-fire-in-a-crowded-theater

Yes, You Can Yell 'Fire' in a Crowded Theater - Reason.com

Oct 27, 2022Free Speech. Yes, You Can Yell 'Fire'inaCrowdedTheater On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito repeated the common myth that "shouting 'fire'inacrowdedtheater" is unprotected speech.

"Shouting fire in a crowded theater" - Reason.com

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., photographed by Frances Benjamin Johnston (1902), from the Library of Congress. People often argue some speech is unprotected by analogizing to shouting fire in ...

How To Yell 'Fire' in a Crowded Theater - Reason.com

Just as you cannot yell "fire" in a crowded theater, they argue, you can't say insert false speech here. But you often can utter or publish a falsehood without a regulator or court having the ...

theatlantic.com

Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

Share feedback about this site

https://www.theatlantic.com › ideas › archive › 2022 › 01 › shouting-fire-crowded-theater-speech-regulation › 621151

America's Favorite Flimsy Pretext for Limiting Free Speech

Shouting "Fire" inacrowdedtheater, a metaphor that dates to a 1919 Supreme Court ruling by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., is widely—and wrongly—held to be a far-reaching exception ...

yahoo.com

Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

Share feedback about this site

https://www.yahoo.com › news › yes-tim-walz-shout-fire-175907630.html

Yes, Tim Walz, You Can Shout 'Fire' In A Crowded Theatre (opinion) - Yahoo

4 days agoIt's a common misconception that shouting "fire" inacrowded theatre isn't protected by the First Amendment—a myth that originates from a hypothetical used in Justice Oliver Wendell

Joe, we'll never notice you've left

we're in for a seamless transition

Kamala Harris Chokes After Teleprompter Glitch Derails Campaign Speech

Matt Margolis:

…. But, the true moment that everyone will remember, the moment that has gone viral on social media, is when Kamala's teleprompter briefly failed, and she had no idea what to say. 

"Remember his number? 32. Today, we got 32 days until the election," she said, full of energy. And then the teleprompter failed, and their was a long, awkward pause, and Kamala had no idea what to say, and started to wing it. "So 32 days. 32 days. Okay. We got some business to do. We got some business to do. Alright. 32 days. And we know we will do it. And and this is gonna be a very tight race until the very end. This is gonna be a very tight race until the very end. We are the underdog, and we know we have some hard work ahead."

You can literally see the moment it happened by her facial expression. It's pure panic. 

Remember, she was delivering a scripted speech she’s given some version of countless times since becoming the Democratic nominee, yet she completely crumbled. Imagine someone running for president who can’t even think on their feet in such a situation. Does that inspire confidence in her ability to handle high-stakes negotiations with foreign leaders—especially our adversaries?

Trust the experts, and shut up

first, do no harm

Study: COVID-Vaxxed Kids SIX TIMES Likelier to Die Than Unvaxxed Peers

The ostensible takeaway, per the authors, of a poorly-publicized study from June of this year was that children vaccinated for COVID had much higher rates of asthma — almost double, in fact — post-COVID infection than their unvaccinated peers.
That’s compelling enough of a headline, but what should really have been the lede in any sane world got buried deep in the weeds.

Via Infection (medical journal):

Two cohorts of children aged 5 to 18 who underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing were analyzed: unvaccinated children with and without COVID-19 infection, and vaccinated children with and without infection. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias, and hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI were calculated to assess the risk of new-onset asthma.

Our study found a significantly higher incidence of new-onset asthma in COVID-19 infected children compared to uninfected children, regardless of vaccination status. In Cohort 1, 4.7% of COVID-19 infected children without vaccination developed new-onset asthma, versus 2.0% in their non-COVID-19 counterparts within a year (HR = 2.26; 95% CI = 2.158–2.367). For Cohort 2, COVID-19 infected children with vaccination showed an 8.3% incidence of new-onset asthma, higher than the 3.1% in those not infected (HR = 2.745; 95% CI = 2.521–2.99). Subgroup analyses further identified higher risks in males, children aged 5–12 years, and Black or African American children. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of these findings.

The study highlights a strong link between COVID-19 infection and an increased risk of new-onset asthma in children, which is even more marked in those vaccinated. This emphasizes the critical need for ongoing monitoring and customized healthcare strategies to mitigate the long-term respiratory impacts of COVID-19 in children, advocating for thorough strategies to manage and prevent asthma amidst the pandemic.

Double the rate of asthma, sure, but wait — there’s still more!

Via Alex Berenson :

The study about Covid and asthma in American kids and teens has gone mostly unnoticed. It hasn’t been cited once since it was published in June.

Which may be why no one has raised an alarm over the stunning figures buried in its appendix about deaths among mRNA Covid-vaccinated kids.

They show that 354 of the 64,000 children and teenagers who received a Covid mRNA shot died within a year after vaccination - a death rate of almost six kids per 1,000.

In contrast, only 309 out of 320,000 unvaccinated kids died, fewer than one per 1,000.

would we lie to you?