Who are they protecting at the expense of their own citizens? More accurately, why?
/Connecticut bill would (further) protect immigrants, target companies aiding deportations
HARTFORD — The Democrat-dominated Judiciary Committee on Tuesday approved legislation aimed at protecting Connecticut [illegal] immigrants from deportation at the hands of federal immigration agents. And in a late redrafting of the Trust Act legislation Tuesday morning, companies that assist in deporting residents — such as Avelo Airlines — could see subsidies revoked.
Republicans warned that the proposal would attempt to usurp the role of the federal government's role in overseeing immigration.
… Building on a 2019 law, this year's proposal, which passed along party lines and next heads to the House of Representatives, would apply to all law enforcement as well as state prosecutors and the Board of Pardons and Paroles as well as local governments, prohibiting them from helping U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. [bolding added]Towns and cities not in compliance with the proposal, if it becomes law, could be forced into obeying it through orders by the state superior court.
"The bill also works to address a rising issue we've seen of unsafe encounters in front of our courthouses between individuals arriving either for their own court date or to accompany a loved one or to serve as a witness or even victims of crimes showing up for a court date and then being chased down the street by ICE officers," Stafstrom said. "This bill also works to ensure that those who are receiving state funds, those state contractors and those state recipients of grants and state funding are not engaging in or assisting in immigration activities with those funds." (I don’t think he means illegals on welfare “engaging in immigration activities” by living in this country.)
Sanity speaks, but will be ignored by this Democrat-ruled state:
"We agree, as being part of the United States of America, to come together under the federal Constitution," said Rep. Craig Fishbein of Wallingford, a ranking Republican on the panel. "The federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over immigration because our federal government has the whole border of the whole country. It's key and it's important that our federal law enforcement is able to cooperate with local law enforcement with regard to enforcing federal law. Any action by anybody — especially by the state — to impede that, to hold that back, slow it down, is in my mind unconstitutional and unAmerican. If you don't support the United States of American, you're unAmerican."
State Rep. Patrick Callahan, R-New Fairfield, a former state probation department worker, recalled helping the federal Immigration and Naturalization Service and later ICE remove criminal immigrants. "These were people that were becoming an impediment to the good people of the legal immigrant community living a good life," he said, stressing that at the time, before the first Trust Act in 2013, they were able to seize those offenders in a more "controlled" environment of a prison, probation office or court house.
"I worked cases with the Secret Service, the FBI, local police, State Police, all in the name of community safety, public safety," Callahan said, adding that the original Trust Act prevented him from even communicating with ICE after 2013. That led to federal agents becoming more public, going into people homes or encountering undocumented immigrants outside a court house, including an incident in Danbury where a person fleeing ICE was hit by a vehicle and hospitalized in 2018.
"I don't understand why we want to keep people who are convicted of crimes and are subject to deportation off the radar, because those are people I'm sure that the good people that we live alongside in the immigrant community would prefer they aren't there either," Callahan said. "This is the wrong thing to be doing, ignoring federal law. If people are here illegally and don't want to be subject to deportation, don't commit crimes. Live peacefully and no one's going to bother you, for the most part."
And leave it to Billy:
In recent public hearings on the proposal, Attorney General William Tong warned that immigrants are afraid to interact with public agencies that can help them contribute to the economy through such things as mundane as car insurance and drivers' licenses. They may get discouraged from reporting criminal incidents. Tong stressed that the proposed law would not shield violent felons from ICE; protect those on terrorist watch lists; nor restrict federal immigration authorities from enforcing the law within Connecticut. Yes it will; in fact, that’s the precise purpose of this law.
Understand, this latest is an expansion of what the Democrats have already done:
2019: CT Senate passes bill restricting cooperation with ICE
Connecticut jumped back into the contentious national debate over immigration enforcement as Senate Democrats voted early Wednesday to pass a bill that would further restrict how police and court personnel can work with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement to detain undocumented immigrants.
The bill would expand the Trust Act, a measure that effectively rebuked President Barack Obama’s immigration enforcement policies when passed six years ago by prohibiting the detention of undocumented immigrants in the absence of a threat to public safety, an outstanding arrest warrant or a final order of deportation.
With one Democrat absent due to a family emergency, the Senate voted 20-15 at 1:50 a.m. after nearly an eight-hour debate to pass and send the measure to the House of Representatives. Sen. Joan Hartley, D-Waterbury, voted with all 14 Republicans against the bill.
“It is a very scary time for a number of people in this country. We’re seeing an unprecedented attack on immigrants in this country. Our state is better than that.”
Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff, D-Norwalk