I've been posting this same statistic for years, every time to plastic straw/shopping bag loonies screech for more controls, but it never hurts to remind ourselves

/

Now do the same thinking about CO2 emissions and the deindustrialization of the west

Insubordination

/

DEI Admiral fired, as she should have been

As we reported late Tuesday, Navy Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield was allegedly fired for refusing to hang pictures of President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at NATO headquarters. Of course, Democrat Jasmine Crockett saw this firing as a perfect opportunity to blind us with her blazing ignorance. She responded to a post on X by Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell. Don’t worry he sets her straight.

Here’s Crockett.

It’s a fine thing to take a principled stand, but you have to be willing to pay the price; now she has, and presumably has no complaints.

(Not to take anything away from her service, but the medals she’s wearing, and she’s certainly entitled to do so, are pretty much participation trophies — she’s replaceable.)

  • Distinguished Service Medal

  • Defense Superior Service Medal

  • Bronze Star Medal *

  • Legion of Merit (two awards)

  • Meritorious Service Medal

  • Joint Service Commendation Medal

  • Navy Commendation Medal (three awards)

  • Army Commendation Medal

  • Air Force Commendation Medal

  • Joint Service Achievement Medal

  • Navy Achievement Medal

*Navy Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for her service as the commander of a joint provincial reconstruction team in Farah Province, Afghanistan, in 2008. During this assignment, she led efforts to support reconstruction and development initiatives in a challenging and volatile environment. The Bronze Star is awarded for heroic or meritorious achievement or service in a combat zone, and her leadership in this role, which involved coordinating military and civilian efforts to stabilize and rebuild the region, likely contributed to her receiving this honor. While specific details of the citation are not publicly detailed in available sources, her command of the reconstruction team during a period of active conflict aligns with the criteria for the award, reflecting her exceptional performance under demanding circumstances.

As we were just saying earlier ...

/

David Strom, HotAir:

Finally, a Drone Killer That Doesn't Break the Bank

Everybody is talking about drone warfare, which has democratized long-range, low-risk strikes on adversaries. 

Capabilities that used to be the exclusive province of major militaries with large, very capable air forces with stealth aircraft are now available to everyone, including countries like Iran and even terrorist groups living in medieval conditions like the Houthis. 

Even before Trump and Biden decided to ramp up their attacks on the Houthis, the US had spent nearly a billion dollars and expended a lot of hard-to-replace munitions to shoot down inexpensive drones that have been attacking commercial shipping and naval vessels, shutting down almost all shipping in the Red Sea. 

You can argue that the cost was worth it--it probably was, as Alex Hollings of Sandboxx News argued, but you can't argue that there aren't much better and cheaper ways to accomplish the task. Sending a multi-million dollar missile to shoot down a $25- or $50-thousand dollar drone is a bad exchange ratio, and finding a cheaper way to accomplish the task was necessary. 

And that cheaper way is here. Much cheaper, easier, and replaceable than an SM-3 or SM-6 missile that might be needed to fight China someday soon. Ammunition magazines are not infinitely stocked, resources are not unlimited, and our responsibilities extend far beyond ensuring that the sea lanes for European trade are kept open. The mission might be important, but it is not the only important mission.

Xi Jinping probably chuckled every time we fired a multi-million dollar missile to take down a Shahed drone. 

So I was intrigued when Alex described a new mission for the old, reliable, but not especially accurate unguided missile that has been in use for many decades. As with unguided bombs to which JDAM kits were installed, some clever engineers have managed to turn these rockets into drone killers that are remarkably cheap, reliable, and that give a modern fighter jet an amazing magazine of ammunition to take down drones at a rapid rate. 

Take a look at the massive drone attack on Israel in which a coalition of Middle Eastern countries and the United States collaborated to shoot down over 100 drones and missiles aimed at Israel. It was a grueling and expensive task to defend Israel from an overwhelming drone swarmed aimed at civilians. 

Most of the kills came from expending very expensive air-to-air missiles, and each aircraft can carry relatively few of them. The task was so urgent that many aircraft resorted to firing guns, with extremely limited ammunition and poor accuracy, endangering the aircraft and accomplishing relatively little compared to the time involved. 

Now the alternative has arrived. 

Originally designed for use against lightly armored ground targets back in 2008, this system takes an existing 2.75-inch fin-stabilized but unguided rocket and adds a soda can-sized mid-body guidance unit, called the WGU-59/B, behind the warhead but ahead of its existing Mk 66 Mod 4 rocket motor. In order to make sure these weapons still fit in their standard launch tubes, BAE Systems incorporated the guidance sensors into four small, foldable wings, each housing laser-seeker optics that are blended together into a single, wide field of view.

The cost? About $25,000, making for a 1:1 or even 2:1 cost ratio. And, obviously, $25,000 means a lot less to the USA than to Iran or the Houthis. 

….

And while the cost to replace those Sidewinders and AMRAAMs will range from as little as $52 million (if they were all cheap Sidewinders) to as much as $146 million (if they were all pricier AMRAAMs)… the cost of replacing all 168 expended rockets would have been a comparatively tiny $4.2 million. 

You could literally buy an F-35 and two Black Hawk helicopters with what these weapons could have saved in that single engagement alone.

More details at the link, and if that’s not sufficient to your needs for more information, Strom provides further links:

I highly recommend Alex Hollings' excellent article on this weapon, and recommend following him on Sandboxx News, X, and YouTube. His stuff is excellent, his videos fun to watch and informative, and it's an easy way to keep up with developments (and sometimes history) in the military realm. 

It fared better this time

/

20 Dingletown Road, asking $4.8 million, is under contract after just 5 days. Allowing for the time expended drawing up contracts, that’s pretty much overnight.

The soon-to-be former owners are the beneficiary of the original builders’ “bad luck”: they paid $3.6 million in 2010 after those builders — real estate agents in their other lives — had paid $1.420 for the land in 2004 and attempted to get $5.395 million ($8,459,000 in current dollars) for their completed project, beginning in July 2006 and ending when theyt finally tired of the game and sold it for that $3.6 in 2010.

Different times, different market.

The rule of law, Connecticut style

/

Stop!

“Mistreatment” is the pretext, thwarting the deportation of illegal aliens is the goal

NEW HAVEN — Connecticut Attorney General William Tong sent a strongly worded letter to Avelo Airlines founder and CEO Andrew Levy Tuesday, seeking assurances that deportation charter flights Avelo plans to run from Arizona won't violate the rights of immigrants.

Tong's letter seeks assurances that Avelo won't shackle deportees — particularly children — and that the flights will not be used to separate children from their parents or to deport immigrants without a valid deportation order, among other issues.

It threatens to "rescind (state) support for and partnership with Avelo ... absent clear, public commitments to safety and the rule of law."
 
….

"Let’s be clear what these flights are doing. These are flights separating parents from their children. These are flights where people—men, women and children — are shackled in handcuffs, waist chains and leg irons, where flight attendants have said there is no safe plan to evacuate people in an emergency," the letter states.

"No one is forcing Avelo to operate these flights. If reporting is accurate, Avelo has freely chosen to profit from and facilitate these atrocities," Tong said. "The State of Connecticut has an obligation now to review this business decision and to consider the viability of our choice to support Avelo."

Tong said "it is the policy of the State of Connecticut to support, honor and protect families, to uphold public safety and to defend the rule of law. Connecticut taxpayers have supported Avelo’s growth in our state by exempting state taxes on aviation fuel. Connecticut public officials have joined Avelo in celebrating and promoting new routes and expanded business in our state. Such support is a policy choice that may be revisited should Avelo’s business practices conflict with Connecticut priorities and policies.," he wrote.

Tong requested a copy of Avelo's contract with DHS or its agent and asked whether Avelo can confirm that it will not operate deportation flights from any Connecticut airport. He also asked it to confirm that it will not operate flights while non-violent passengers are in shackles, handcuffs, waist chains or leg irons "and unable to safely evacuate in the event of an emergency."

Tong also asked Avelo to confirm that it will never operate a flight without a safe and timely evacuation strategy for all passengers "should restraint be necessary," that "it will never operate flights with shackled children," and that it will never operate deportation flights in defiance of a court order, or one involving passengers for whom there is no valid order of removal.

"Can Avelo confirm that it will never operate a flight to deport a child born on American soil?" he asked.

Tong’s demand is merely one part of a determined effort by the state to resist enforcement of federal immigration laws:

Tong's letter went out as Tong and the state consider whether to revoke already-awarded state support for Avelo,  including a $2 million revenue guarantee and a two-year freeze on aviation fuel tax, in response to news that Avelo plans to begin flight deportation charter flights under contract to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, or DHS.

A few billion dollars and ten years late, but that's defense spending for you

/

New Navy chief 'regrets' costly missile interceptors against Houthis, pushes for cheaper Red Sea defense

'I had not been thoughtful enough to think about the UAV threat where I think a much lesser-powered weapon would have done what we needed it to do,' says Adm James Kilby

“UAV” — that’s military speak for “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle” — a drone, to you and me; you know, the ones you can buy from Amazon?

New acting Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. James Kilby said he regrets the Navy’s reliance on expensive, high-powered missile interceptors to counter the Houthi threat in the Red Sea and pledged to push for cheaper, more efficient solutions.

Speaking to reporters at the Sea Air Space conference in National Harbor, Maryland, Kilby said he was "not concerned" about the Navy’s ability to protect its people – such as the 350 sailors aboard the USS Carney missile destroyer – or its ability to safeguard commercial shipping.

He is concerned, however, about "not having better ways to more economically attrit the threat." 

In his former role as deputy commander of Fleet Forces Command, Kilby said he was "focused on a high-end laser – 500kW to one megawatt – and I have regret for that."

"I had not been thoughtful enough to think about the UAV threat, where I think a much lesser-powered weapon would have done what we needed it to do," Kilby said.

He promised the Navy was now working to overhaul its costly defense tactics with "much more cost-effective" technologies to counter autonomous vehicles in the Red Sea, as he called on the defense industry to more quickly produce munitions for the mission.

"We have to get after our industrial base or munitions industrial base the same way we have to get after our shipbuilding industrial base," said Kilby. 

Onlookers have long decried the disproportionate cost of taking on the Yemeni rebels. Naval missiles that run around $2 million a shot have been used to take out drones that cost the Houthis no more than $2,000. Since the March 15 offensive began, the Houthis have also downed three MQ-9 Reaper drones — each worth about $30 million.

The Ukrainian war exercises have shown what cheap, disposable drones can do against Russian tanks and ships; we shouldn’t have needed the primitive Houthis to drive the lesson home.