Well, this is discouraging news
/
FWIW’s LA correspondent has briefly emerged from hiding to surreptitiously send this link from Alex Berenson’s Substack column: COVID vaccines will prevent you from acquiring full immunity even if you get infected and recover.
Don’t take it from me, I don’t even get to tweet anymore.
Take it from a little place I call the British government. Which admitted today, in its newest vaccine surveillance report, that:
“N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” (Page 23)
What’s this mean? Several things, all bad. We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).
What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.
This means vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE (or more than once, probably).
It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction, because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.
Aside from that, everything is fine.
And there’s also this:
Yale Study: Natural Immunity Protects Against COVID Three Times Longer Than Vaccine
What to make of these reports? Who knows? But I don’t believe the CDC or its crazed Nazi enforcers do, either, but they’re charging full-speed ahead. Watch this nurse practitioner refuse treatment to a teen because he hasn’t been vaccinated with COVID juice.
The mother, in this case, brings her teen boy in to be checked because he is not feeling well. The young man looks athletic. What we don’t see before the mother starts filming is that the Nurse Practitioner has already diagnosed the teen with sinusitis, an ear infection and bronchitis. Then, because the teen has not been vaccinated for Covid, the Nurse Practitioner refuses to prescribe antibiotics. That is when the mother starts filming.
I’m taking this with a grain of salt, because we’re seeing a partial tape of the incident: for instance, antibiotics are rarely prescribed for ear infections, which go away by themselves after a few days. Did the nurse practitioner also diagnose a sinus infection and bronchitis, for which (this non-doctor blogger says) would be appropriate, as the mother claims? And did she really refuse to treat the boy because he wasn’t vaccinated? I’m betting that this happened as the mother describes it, because it’s perfectly in line with what various other nurses and physicians have been doing elsewhere. So, roll the tape.
