Principle over popularity — so rare a commodity down in the swamp

ghost at the banquet

Sen. Rand Paul (temporarily, alas) derails the Ukrainian train, demands accountability before we send billions to its notoriously corrupt government

….

The $40 billion aid package had already passed the House on Tuesday, with only 54 Republicans voting against it. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell agreed to fast-track the spending bill through the upper chamber on Thursday. But when Schumer asked the legislative body if there were any objections to passing it with a simple unanimous vote, Kentucky Republican Rand Paul threw a monkeywrench into the machinery.

…. After a summary of the financial pain in which Americans find themselves, such as drastically increased prices for food, fuel, and cars, Paul said, “Inflation doesn’t just come out of nowhere; it comes from deficit spending.”

“If this gift to Ukraine passes, our total aid to Ukraine will almost equal the entire military budget of Russia,” Paul pointed out. When combined with the $13 billion the Unites States has already sent to Ukraine, the new cash dump would bring total U.S. aid to the nation to almost $54 billion — just this spring. Russia’s entire military budget in 2021 was just under $66 billion.

“And it’s not as if we have that money lying around; we will have to borrow that money from China to send it to Ukraine,” he added. He also said that “The cost of this package we are voting on today is more than the U.S. spent during the first year of the U.S. conflict in Afghanistan.”

Paul also said, “the billions of dollars in funding towers in comparison to what the United States spends on cancer research annually—$6 billion—and is more than the government collects in gas taxes each year to build roads and bridges. It nearly equals the entire State Department budget … and exceeds the budget for the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Energy.”

He then offered an amendment to the bill:

“So I act to modify the bill to allow for a special inspector general,” he proposed. “This would be the inspector general that’s been overseeing the waste in Afghanistan and has done a great job.”

But Rand’s amendment is going nowhere, as that paragon of virtue and independence Chuck Schumer was quick to point out:

 “It’s clear from the junior senator from Kentucky’s remarks, he doesn’t want to aid Ukraine,” douched the frustrated senator. “All he will accomplish with his actions here today is to delay that aid, not to stop it.”

In a thread Paul tweeted after the vote, he summarized:

My oath of office is to the U.S. Constitution, not to any foreign nation. Congress is trying yet again to ram through a spending bill – one that I doubt anyone has actually read – and there’s no oversight included into how the money is being spent.

All I requested is an amendment to be included in the final bill that allows for the Inspector General to oversee how funds are spent. Anyone who is opposed to this is irresponsible.

While I sympathize with the people of Ukraine, and commend their fight against Putin, we cannot continue to spend money we don’t have. Passing this bill brings the total we’ve sent to Ukraine to nearly $54 billion over the course of two months.

It’s threatening our own national security, and it’s frankly a slap in the face to millions of taxpayers who are struggling to buy gas, groceries, and find baby formula.

Withe exception of his throwing in the reference to baby formula — that shortage has much to do about over-regulation and tariffs, but seems off-point in a discussion about deficit spending — Paul is on target. To no avail, of course.