Fat, dumb and clueless is no way to go through life, Timmy

Tim Walz thought his lack of wealth was 'real flex' against Trump: 'How ... did we lose to a billionaire?

Hey, I know what we should do next time: double-down on woke!

The failed VP candidate has been returned by his handlers to Minnesota, where he’s given an interview to a sympathetic local newspaper, expressing his disappointment and wondering where things went wrong.

"How in the world did we lose to a billionaire or a venture capitalist, when we were making the case of a country attorney and a high school teacher?" he asked later in the interview, contrasting his ticket with Trump’s.

Walz made the point that he thought his more humble economic status should have appealed to voters, and seemed puzzled that wasn’t the case.

"And I thought that would be something people say, ‘Well, this guy knows where we’re coming from. He’s had to pay his bills and still does,'" he said, referring to himself. [Vance grew up even poorer than Walz, but unlike this assistant high school football coach, made something of himself.]

Earlier in the discussion, Walz stated, "And this is the one that keeps me up at night, is I focused my whole career in focusing on the middle class… And it seemed like a lot of good ideas were coming from the Democrats."

"I still believe that," he continued, "but apparently in this election, not the majority of Americans did. They chose to vote with a billionaire, who’s talked about not paying overtime, who has a long history of not paying his workers, someone who wants to take away the ACA." [Heavens, how could the peasants possibly not be worried that ObamaKare might be repealed?]

Seeing this, Walz concluded that this happened because his party did not communicate their middle-class appeal well enough.

"So, I come back to the conclusion, is we did not do a good enough job – we as a Democratic Party and we as a ticket – did not do a good enough job of showing them that we understand where they’re coming from," the governor said.

He added, "And I feel like one of my roles is – going forward here is – figuring out a way to make the case to the public, the American public, is that the Democratic Party really is focused on the things they care about."

Clueless to the end, and beyond, Walz doesn’t realize that he has no role “going forward”; worse, he still believes that his party is “focused on things the American public care about”, like genital mutilation of minors, open borders for the world’s poor, forced purchase of $70,000 battery cars, elimination of cheap, abundant energy, destroy our military, and, of course, mandate tampon dispensers in boys bathrooms.

Keep it up, guy; may your party stay out of power forever.