One’s right to self-identify is dependent upon how the Guardians judge your looks
/
Boy, girl, lady hippo? It’s not for him to judge
It all started when LGBT activists in media and government pounced on the tragic shooting at ClubQ, a gay and lesbian nightclub in Colorado Springs. In the complete absence of evidence, a coordinated media campaign immediately painted conservative rhetoric and Christian beliefs as the culprit that motivated the killer to go on his violent rampage which killed 5 and wounded several others.
But when the facts emerged, as is so often the case, they didn't fit the anti-Christian narrative. As it turned out, the killer was the furthest thing from a Christ follower or one who espoused Christian orthodoxy on matters of sexuality. Self-identifying as "non-binary" (meaning he nonsensically believed himself to be neither male nor female), he was, in fact, firmly entrenched in radical gender ideology and its cultural revolution.
Suddenly an amazing phenomenon took place:
What? He doesn’t look like a girl? Is that the new standard? I thought the right of a male to share a locker room with your 12-year-old daughter was inviolate, so long as he professed to “feel like a girl” — now there’s some sort of “objective” test that must be passed, a test drawn up and scored by media-approved judges? This all seems unfair, somehow. Unfair, and cruel.
By the way: what, exactly, is an “online extremism expert”? Just asking.
